On 8.03.2023 12:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8.03.2023 12:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:09:48AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6.03.2023 18:08, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>>>>> The SM6125 UFS PHY is compatible with the one from SM6115. Add a
>>>>> compatible for it and modify the config from SM6115 to make them
>>>>> compatible with the SC8280XP binding
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>>>>> index 318eea35b972..44c29fdfc551 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>>>>> @@ -620,6 +620,13 @@ static const char * const qmp_phy_vreg_l[] = {
>>>>> "vdda-phy", "vdda-pll",
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +static const struct qmp_ufs_offsets qmp_ufs_offsets_v3_660 = {
>>>>> + .serdes = 0,
>>>>> + .pcs = 0xc00,
>>>>> + .tx = 0x400,
>>>>> + .rx = 0x600,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> static const struct qmp_ufs_offsets qmp_ufs_offsets_v5 = {
>>>>> .serdes = 0,
>>>>> .pcs = 0xc00,
>>>>> @@ -693,6 +700,8 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_cfg sdm845_ufsphy_cfg = {
>>>>> static const struct qmp_phy_cfg sm6115_ufsphy_cfg = {
>>>>> .lanes = 1,
>>>>>
>>>>> + .offsets = &qmp_ufs_offsets_v3_660,
>>>> Will this not trigger OOB r/w for the users of qcom,sm6115-smp-ufs-phy
>>>> which specify the regions separately (old binding style)?
>>>
>>> No, that should work fine.
>> So do you think the SM6115 binding could be updated too? Or should
>> we keep it as-is for ABI purposes?..
>
> They could be and the possibility has been raised. I think it may be
> more important to convert the old combo-phy binding (it's on my list,
> but I keep getting preempted), but at some point we can get rid of the
> legacy UFS binding as well.
Okay sounds good!
>
>>> But looks like this series needs to be rebased on 6.3-rc1 as these
>>> offsets are now already set in mainline.
>> ..Or did you do that already and I can't find it?
>
> It seems a previous version of this patch was merged almost two months
> ago.
>
> 9b9e29af984c ("phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM6125 UFS PHY support")
>
> Not sure what failed here.
My eyes :)
Konrad
>
> Johan
