Hi Konrad,
On Wed Mar 8, 2023 at 2:27 AM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Add a SoC-specific compatbile to cpufreq_hw for compliancy with bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
> index 1e1d366c92c1..c18ca947618e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
> @@ -1995,7 +1995,7 @@ osm_l3: interconnect@18321000 {
> };
>
> cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@18323000 {
> - compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw";
> + compatible = "qcom,sm6350-cpufreq-hw", "qcom,cpufreq-hw";
> reg = <0 0x18323000 0 0x1000>, <0 0x18325800 0 0x1000>;
> reg-names = "freq-domain0", "freq-domain1";
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;
>
> --
> 2.39.2
