The configs are identical, other than the number of *maximum* DSI
hosts allowed. This isn't an issue, unless somebody deliberately
tries to access the inexistent host by adding a dt node for it.
Remove the SC7180 struct and point the hw revision match to the
SDM845's one. On a note, this could have been done back when
7180 support was introduced.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c | 15 ++-------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
index d39521850018..6d4b2ce4b918 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sdm845_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_v2_4_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_v2_4_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xae94000, 0xae96000 },
+ { 0xae94000, 0xae96000 }, /* SDM845 / SDM670 / SC7180 */
},
};
@@ -188,17 +188,6 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sm8550_dsi_cfg = {
},
};
-static const struct msm_dsi_config sc7180_dsi_cfg = {
- .io_offset = DSI_6G_REG_SHIFT,
- .regulator_data = dsi_v2_4_regulators,
- .num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_v2_4_regulators),
- .bus_clk_names = dsi_v2_4_clk_names,
- .num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_v2_4_clk_names),
- .io_start = {
- { 0xae94000 },
- },
-};
-
static const struct regulator_bulk_data sc7280_dsi_regulators[] = {
{ .supply = "vdda", .init_load_uA = 8350 }, /* 1.2 V */
};
@@ -299,7 +288,7 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_cfg_handler dsi_cfg_handlers[] = {
{MSM_DSI_VER_MAJOR_6G, MSM_DSI_6G_VER_MINOR_V2_4_0,
&sdm845_dsi_cfg, &msm_dsi_6g_v2_host_ops},
{MSM_DSI_VER_MAJOR_6G, MSM_DSI_6G_VER_MINOR_V2_4_1,
- &sc7180_dsi_cfg, &msm_dsi_6g_v2_host_ops},
+ &sdm845_dsi_cfg, &msm_dsi_6g_v2_host_ops},
{MSM_DSI_VER_MAJOR_6G, MSM_DSI_6G_VER_MINOR_V2_5_0,
&sc7280_dsi_cfg, &msm_dsi_6g_v2_host_ops},
{MSM_DSI_VER_MAJOR_6G, MSM_DSI_6G_VER_MINOR_V2_6_0,
--
2.39.2
