On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 3:55 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/23 00:51, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> > <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos
> >>> <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> >>>>>> Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check'
> >>>>>> is performed the following warning appears:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series
> >>>>> through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an
> >>>> Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>
> >>> I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply
> >>> newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2
> >>> and 3 of this series?
> >>
> >> yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that.
> >> If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them.
> >> What's the best way forward ?
> >
> > Both trees work for me. The rest of the patches of this series should
> > go through the watchdog tree. Guenter, what is better for you?
> >
>
> Wim is handling pull requests. He has queued the other three patches in his
> tree. I would suggest to apply the two remaining patches through the mips
> tree.
Thanks for letting me know, Guenter.
Thomas, please, take the patches 2 and 3 through the mips tree, then.
Thanks,
Sergio Paracuellos
>
> Guenter
>
> > Thanks,
> > Sergio Paracuellos
> >
> >>
> >> Thomas.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> >> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
>
