Re: [Patch v5] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: convert bindings to json-schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/02/2023 12:38, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
>>> +          - samsung,mfc-v5              # Exynos4
>>> +          - samsung,mfc-v6              # Exynos5
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - samsung,exynos3250-mfc  # Exynos3250
>>> +          - const: samsung,mfc-v7       # Fall back for Exynos3250
>>> +      - enum:
>>> +          - samsung,mfc-v7              # Exynos5420
>>> +          - samsung,mfc-v8              # Exynos5800
>>> +          - samsung,exynos5433-mfc      # Exynos5433
>>> +          - samsung,mfc-v10             # Exynos7880
>>
>> Why this and first enum are separate?  I didn't notice it before...
>> Usually we have only one enum for one-compatible variants. Also, sort them
>> by compatible.
>>
> okay.
> I will keep it in this way
> properties:
>   compatible:
>     oneOf:
>       - const: samsung,mfc-v5              # Exynos4
>       - const: samsung,mfc-v6              # Exynos5
>       - const: samsung,mfc-v7              # Exynos5420
>       - const: samsung,mfc-v8              # Exynos5800
>       - const: samsung,exynos5433-mfc      # Exynos5433
>       - const: samsung,mfc-v10             # Exynos7880

These should still be an enum (and sorted by compatible).

>       - items:
>           - const: samsung,exynos3250-mfc  # Exynos3250
>           - const: samsung,mfc-v7          # Fall back for Exynos3250
> 
> Will this be fine?



Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux