On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:59:32PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 2/10/2023 2:49 PM, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On 1/28/2023 5:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 07:14:14PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > > > Allow for different platforms to be notified on USB SND > > > > connect/disconnect > > > > seqeunces. This allows for platform USB SND modules to properly > > > > initialize > > > > and populate internal structures with references to the USB SND chip > > > > device. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > sound/usb/card.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > sound/usb/card.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/sound/usb/card.c b/sound/usb/card.c > > > > index 26268ffb8274..803230343c16 100644 > > > > --- a/sound/usb/card.c > > > > +++ b/sound/usb/card.c > > > > @@ -117,6 +117,24 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(skip_validation, "Skip > > > > unit descriptor validation (default: no) > > > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(register_mutex); > > > > static struct snd_usb_audio *usb_chip[SNDRV_CARDS]; > > > > static struct usb_driver usb_audio_driver; > > > > +static struct snd_usb_platform_ops *platform_ops; > > > > > > You can not have a single "platform_ops" pointer, this HAS to be > > > per-bus. > > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > I looked at seeing how we could implement this at a per bus level, but the > USB class driver model doesn't exactly have a good framework for supporting > this. Reason being is because, at the time of the USB SND class driver > initialization, there is a big chance that there isn't a USB bus registered > in the system, so the point of adding the operations is not clear. However, > we need to ensure that we've added the platform/driver operations before any > USB SND devices are detected. But the offload "engine" is associated with the specific USB bus controller instance in the system, so perhaps you are just not adding this to the correct location? The sound core shouldn't care about this at all, add the logic to the USB host controller driver instead, why isn't this just another USB bus function? > To add to the above, in case of OTG/DRD (dual role) designs, the USB HCD/bus > isn't created until we move into the host role. At that time, using DWC3 as > an example, we will create the XHCI platform device, and probe the USB HCD, > where a USB bus is created. Great, again, tie it to the specific xhci host controler instance. > In general, we currently think this USB offload driver should co-exist with > the USB SND class driver, which handles all devices connected across every > bus. And that is incorrect, please do not do that. > We can add a check to the platform connect routine to ensure that > there is a reference to the USB backend. If so, then that particular USB > bus/sysdev can be supported by the audio DSP. That way, we do not falsely > populate USB SND cards which are present on another USB bus/controller. You should NEVER be able to populate a USB card unless the USB bus controller has given you the USB interface structure to control, so I do not understand how this is an issue. thanks, greg k-h