Hi Suzuki,
Currently if the dsb_esize is not set to 32 or 64, we will not set the
DSBSIZE bit of the register here.
This design is really not good enough.
I will change this in the next version of patch to issue a warning if an
unexpected value is obtained.
在 2/22/2023 8:46 PM, Suzuki K Poulose 写道:
On 19/01/2023 07:41, Tao Zhang wrote:
Read the DSB element size from the device tree. Set the register
bit that controls the DSB element size of the corresponding port.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <taozha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c | 62
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.h | 4 ++
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c
b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c
index 5989798..be13e08 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ static void tpda_enable_port(struct tpda_drvdata
*drvdata, int port)
u32 val;
val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDA_Pn_CR(port));
+ /*
+ * Configure aggregator port n DSB data set element size
+ * Set the bit to 0 if the size is 32
+ * Set the bit to 1 if the size is 64
+ */
+ if (drvdata->dsb_esize[port] == 32)
+ val &= ~TPDA_Pn_CR_DSBSIZE;
+ else if (drvdata->dsb_esize[port] == 64)
+ val |= TPDA_Pn_CR_DSBSIZE;
What are the chances of having a value other than 32 or 64 ?
What should we do in that case ? Should the driver at least
give out a warning at least in the unhandled case rather than
silently reusing the existing setting ?
Suzuki
Best,
Tao
