Hi Shravan,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:43:42AM +0000, Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: shravan Chippa - I35088
> > Sent: 27 January 2023 05:40 AM
> > To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: paul.j.murphy@xxxxxxxxx; daniele.alessandrelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> > mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-imx@xxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] media: i2c: imx334: update pixel and
> > link frequency
> >
> > Hi Sakari,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
> > > Sent: 25 January 2023 03:12 PM
> > > To: shravan Chippa - I35088 <Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: paul.j.murphy@xxxxxxxxx; daniele.alessandrelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-imx@xxxxxxx; linux-
> > media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] media: i2c: imx334: update pixel
> > > and link frequency
> > >
> > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know
> > > the content is safe
> > >
> > > Hi Shravan,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 05:34:02AM +0000, Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Sakari,
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: 24 January 2023 04:33 AM
> > > > > To: shravan Chippa - I35088 <Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: paul.j.murphy@xxxxxxxxx; daniele.alessandrelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-imx@xxxxxxx;
> > > > > linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] media: i2c: imx334: update
> > > > > pixel and link frequency
> > > > >
> > > > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > > > > know the content is safe
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Shravan,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 09:07:13AM +0530, shravan kumar wrote:
> > > > > > From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Update pixel_rate and link frequency for 1920x1080@30 while
> > > > > > changing mode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add dummy ctrl cases for pixel_rate and link frequency to avoid
> > > > > > error while changing the modes dynamically.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add support to handle multiple link frequencies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Suggested-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c | 41
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c index 309c706114d2..62b104eaa437
> > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > > > > > @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@
> > > > > > #define IMX334_INCLK_RATE 24000000
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* CSI2 HW configuration */
> > > > > > -#define IMX334_LINK_FREQ 891000000
> > > > > > +#define IMX334_LINK_FREQ_891M 891000000
> > > > > > +#define IMX334_LINK_FREQ_445M 445500000
> > > > > > #define IMX334_NUM_DATA_LANES 4
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define IMX334_REG_MIN 0x00
> > > > > > @@ -139,12 +140,14 @@ struct imx334 {
> > > > > > u32 vblank;
> > > > > > const struct imx334_mode *cur_mode;
> > > > > > struct mutex mutex;
> > > > > > + unsigned long menu_skip_mask;
> > > > > > u32 cur_code;
> > > > > > bool streaming;
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static const s64 link_freq[] = {
> > > > > > - IMX334_LINK_FREQ,
> > > > > > + IMX334_LINK_FREQ_891M,
> > > > > > + IMX334_LINK_FREQ_445M,
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* Sensor mode registers for 1920x1080@30fps */ @@ -468,7
> > > > > > +471,7 @@ static const struct imx334_mode supported_modes[] = {
> > > > > > .vblank_min = 45,
> > > > > > .vblank_max = 132840,
> > > > > > .pclk = 297000000,
> > > > > > - .link_freq_idx = 0,
> > > > > > + .link_freq_idx = 1,
> > > > > > .reg_list = {
> > > > > > .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_1920x1080_regs),
> > > > > > .regs = mode_1920x1080_regs, @@ -598,6
> > > > > > +601,11 @@ static int imx334_update_controls(struct imx334
> > > > > > +*imx334,
> > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > return ret;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx334->pclk_ctrl, mode->pclk,
> > > > > > + mode->pclk, 1, mode->pclk);
> > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx334->hblank_ctrl, mode-
> > >hblank,
> > > > > > mode->hblank, 1, mode->hblank);
> > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > @@ -698,6 +706,8 @@ static int imx334_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> > > > > > pm_runtime_put(imx334->dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > break;
> > > > > > + case V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE:
> > > > > > + case V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ:
> > > > > > case V4L2_CID_HBLANK:
> > > > > > ret = 0;
> > > > > > break;
> > > > > > @@ -1047,7 +1057,7 @@ static int imx334_parse_hw_config(struct
> > > > > > imx334
> > > > > *imx334)
> > > > > > struct fwnode_handle *ep;
> > > > > > unsigned long rate;
> > > > > > int ret;
> > > > > > - int i;
> > > > > > + int i, j;
> > > > >
> > > > > unsigned int would be nicer.
> > > > I will change.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (!fwnode)
> > > > > > return -ENXIO;
> > > > > > @@ -1097,11 +1107,20 @@ static int imx334_parse_hw_config(struct
> > > > > > imx334
> > > > > *imx334)
> > > > > > goto done_endpoint_free;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - for (i = 0; i < bus_cfg.nr_of_link_frequencies; i++)
> > > > > > - if (bus_cfg.link_frequencies[i] == IMX334_LINK_FREQ)
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < bus_cfg.nr_of_link_frequencies; i++) {
> > > > > > + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(link_freq); j++) {
> > > > > > + if (bus_cfg.link_frequencies[i] == link_freq[j]) {
> > > > > > + set_bit(j,
> > > > > > + &imx334->menu_skip_mask);
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a guarantee that you'll only be using the modes with the
> > > > > listed frequencies? I don't see one but I might have missed it.
> > > >
> > > > If I understand it correctly, the question here is, the listed
> > > > freqeunceis and modes are one to one mapped? Then yes.
> > >
> > > I don't see this being checked in imx334_set_pad_format(), for instance.
> > >
> > > If a frequency isn't in DT, the driver isn't supposed to be using it either.
> >
> > Yes, there is no check.
> >
> > But, if a frequency is not in DT, the driver will not add in menu items.
> > So, the function imx334_set_pad_format() -> imx334_update_controls()
> > fails, if we set the frequencies which are not there in the DT or menu items.
> >
>
> Are you ok with the above explanation or any changes you are expecting?
> Please do let me know if there are any changes needed.
> I am planning to send the next version.
There doesn't seem to be anything that would prevent selecting a format
with a wrong link frequency in these patches. Could you address that, or
point me to where this is done? The control can't be changed by the user,
but that's not enough.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
