On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 8:00 AM Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 21/02/23 5:36 pm, Ravi Gunasekaran wrote: > > mux-controller nodes may not have "reg" property. Update the regex > > for such nodes to resolve the dtbs warnings > > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@xxxxxx> > > --- Where's the change history? I doubt I ignored the last 9 versions... > > .../bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml | 8 +++++++- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml > > index 76ef4352e13c..532bfa45e6a0 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml > > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ properties: > > > > patternProperties: > > # Optional children > > - "^mux-controller@[0-9a-f]+$": > > + "^mux-controller(@|-)[0-9a-f]+$": > > Hmm. mmio-mux bindings allow reg property. Why can't we add the same to > mux-controller node in 2/9 ? Yes, do that. Rob