On 17.02.2023 22:13, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 17/02/2023 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> First, it would be nice to know what was the intention of Bryan's commit? > > Sorry I've been grazing this thread but, not responding. > > - qcom,dsi-ctrl-6g-qcm2290 > > is non-compliant with qcom,socid-dsi-ctrl which is our desired naming convention, so that's what the deprecation is about i.e. moving this compat to "qcom,qcm2290-dsi-ctrl" > > Actually I have the question why we are deciding to go with "sm6115" instead of "qcm2290" ? > > The stamp on the package you receive from Thundercomm says "qcm2290" not "sm6115" Correct, but QCM2290 is not supported upstream yet. SM6115 (a different SoC) however is, but it used the qcm2290 compatible as it was a convenient hack to get the DSI host ID recognized based on the (identical-to-qcm2290) base register without additional driver changes. We're now trying to untangle that mess.. Konrad > > ? > > --- > bod > >
