On 12/11/14 17:02, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> And, with a quick grep, I see CONTROL_DEVCONF1 touched in multiple >> places in the kernel. I wonder if adding a pinmux entry for it could >> cause some rather odd problems. > > They can all use pinctrl-single no problem. Can, but don't. That's my worry. If we touch the DEVCONF1 via pinmux, and we have code in mach-omap2 that also touch DEVCONF1, without any knowledge (and locking) between those... So _maybe_ that's not an issue, as the pinmux config we have here is fixed, and done once at boot time, and maybe the code in mach-omap2 that touch DEVCONF1 is also ran just once and not at the same time as the pinmux. But I don't know if that's so. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
