Hello Vignesh and all,
I am writing you to get some clarification on the way the dts/dtsi
naming and include hierarchy is designed for the TI K3 AM62x SOC family.
I read commit f1d17330a5be ("arm64: dts: ti: Introduce base support for AM62x SoC").
I plan to send in the next few weeks some device tree files for
inclusion in the kernel for SOM (or computer on module) based on the
AM62x SOC.
I do envision to have the same dts file for different machine that are
going to use different variant of the AM62x SOC, e.g. AM623 vs AM625 or
just a different number of CPU cores, handling the differences at
runtime (patching the .dtb in U-Boot?) to limit the maintenance effort and
limit the amount of very similar dts files.
Said that we would prefer to stay close with what is considered/agreed
to be the best approach.
Would something like that work or you would have a completely different
expectation?
What would be the expected naming scheme? k3-am62-${board_name}.dts ?
Something else?
k3-am625.dtsi defines the CPU nodes, why are these in a AM625 specific
file? To me this looks like something that would be just the same with
AM623, and at the same time AM6251 has only one core (see [0] Table 5-1).
Am I missing something?
Thanks for your help,
Francesco
[0] https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am625.pdf
