On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 06:04:49PM -0800, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote: > > We are working on a solution where kernel is booted without ACPI tables to keep > the overall system's memory footprints slim and possibly faster boot time. > We have tested this by enabling CONFIG_OF for x86. > Very interesting. Do you comparison on how slow/fast DT version w.r.t ACPI and similarly for the memory footprint ? It would be good to add those information as well. I know some systems just use ACPI static tables as they don't run ACPICA runtime interpretter, was that experimented as well or it wasn't used due to some specific(details please) limitations without it. > I can add this info in cover letter in next version. Yes please. -- Regards, Sudeep
