Hi Alexander,
Another comment.
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 02:17:31PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Both sensors are quite similar. Their specs only differ regarding LVDS
> and parallel output but are identical regarding MIPI-CSI-2 interface.
> But they use a different init setting of hard-coded values, taken from
> the datasheet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Note: The call to v4l2_i2c_subdev_set_name will change the device name
> shown to userspace. So now 'imx290lqr' will be shown instead of 'imx290'.
>
> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> index 1cfdd700bca5..0bfbce8853e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> @@ -173,10 +173,13 @@ enum imx290_colour_variant {
> enum imx290_model {
> IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LQR,
> IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LLR,
> + IMX290_MODEL_IMX327LQR,
> };
>
> struct imx290_model_info {
> enum imx290_colour_variant colour_variant;
> + enum imx290_model model;
> + const char *name;
> };
>
> enum imx290_clk_freq {
> @@ -272,10 +275,14 @@ static const struct imx290_regval imx290_global_init_settings[] = {
> { IMX290_WINWV, 1097 },
> { IMX290_XSOUTSEL, IMX290_XSOUTSEL_XVSOUTSEL_VSYNC |
> IMX290_XSOUTSEL_XHSOUTSEL_HSYNC },
> - { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x300f), 0x00 },
> - { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3010), 0x21 },
> + { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3011), 0x02 },
> { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3012), 0x64 },
> { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3013), 0x00 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct imx290_regval imx290_global_init_settings_290[] = {
> + { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x300f), 0x00 },
> + { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3010), 0x21 },
> { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3016), 0x09 },
> { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3070), 0x02 },
> { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x3071), 0x11 },
> @@ -328,6 +335,12 @@ static const struct imx290_regval xclk_regs[][IMX290_NUM_CLK_REGS] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static const struct imx290_regval imx290_global_init_settings_327[] = {
> + { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x309e), 0x4A },
> + { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x309f), 0x4A },
> + { IMX290_REG_8BIT(0x313b), 0x61 },
> +};
I wonder what the impact of those different init sequences is, as I've
run my IMX327 with this driver without your changes for quite some time
:-)
> +
> static const struct imx290_regval imx290_1080p_settings[] = {
> /* mode settings */
> { IMX290_WINWV_OB, 12 },
> @@ -999,9 +1012,11 @@ static int imx290_start_streaming(struct imx290 *imx290,
> struct v4l2_subdev_state *state)
> {
> const struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *format;
> + const struct imx290_regval *regs;
> + unsigned int reg_num;
> int ret;
>
> - /* Set init register settings */
> + /* Set common init register settings */
> ret = imx290_set_register_array(imx290, imx290_global_init_settings,
> ARRAY_SIZE(imx290_global_init_settings));
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -1009,6 +1024,28 @@ static int imx290_start_streaming(struct imx290 *imx290,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + switch (imx290->model->model) {
> + case IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LQR:
> + case IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LLR:
> + regs = imx290_global_init_settings_290;
> + reg_num = ARRAY_SIZE(imx290_global_init_settings_290);
> + break;
> + case IMX290_MODEL_IMX327LQR:
> + regs = imx290_global_init_settings_327;
> + reg_num = ARRAY_SIZE(imx290_global_init_settings_327);
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(imx290->dev, "Invalid model: %u\n", imx290->model->model);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set init register settings */
> + ret = imx290_set_register_array(imx290, regs, reg_num);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(imx290->dev, "Could not set init registers\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* Set clock parameters based on mode and xclk */
> ret = imx290_set_clock(imx290);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -1479,9 +1516,18 @@ static s64 imx290_check_link_freqs(const struct imx290 *imx290,
> static const struct imx290_model_info imx290_models[] = {
> [IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LQR] = {
> .colour_variant = IMX290_VARIANT_COLOUR,
> + .model = IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LQR,
> + .name = "imx290lqr",
> },
> [IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LLR] = {
> .colour_variant = IMX290_VARIANT_MONO,
> + .model = IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LLR,
> + .name = "imx290llr",
> + },
> + [IMX290_MODEL_IMX327LQR] = {
> + .colour_variant = IMX290_VARIANT_COLOUR,
> + .model = IMX290_MODEL_IMX327LQR,
> + .name = "imx327lqr",
> },
> };
>
> @@ -1496,6 +1542,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx290_of_match[] = {
> }, {
> .compatible = "sony,imx290llr",
> .data = &imx290_models[IMX290_MODEL_IMX290LLR],
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "sony,imx327lqr",
> + .data = &imx290_models[IMX290_MODEL_IMX327LQR],
> },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
> @@ -1630,6 +1679,9 @@ static int imx290_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (ret)
> goto err_pm;
>
> + v4l2_i2c_subdev_set_name(&imx290->sd, client,
> + imx290->model->name, NULL);
> +
> /*
> * Finally, register the V4L2 subdev. This must be done after
> * initializing everything as the subdev can be used immediately after
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
