On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 8:12 AM Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 3. Februar 2023, 20:02:54 CET schrieb Johan Jonker: > > > > On 2/3/23 19:21, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 03:22:14PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote: > > >> Convert rockchip-lvds.txt to YAML. > > >> > > >> Changed: > > >> Add power-domains property. > > >> Requirements between PX30 and RK3288 > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> > > >> Changed V3: > > >> Filename matching compatible style > > >> Drop "Regulator phandle for " > > >> Specify properties and requirements per SoC > > >> Sort order and restyle > > >> > > >> Changed V2: > > >> Fix title > > >> --- > > >> .../display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml | 170 ++++++++++++++++++ > > >> .../display/rockchip/rockchip-lvds.txt | 92 ---------- > > >> 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) > > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml > > >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-lvds.txt > > > > > > > > What's the plan for these patches? Don't see them in linux-next still. > > > Do you want me to take patches 1-8? > > > > Hi, > > > > The display patches normally go through the DRM git. > > Patch 2 must merge with grf.yaml. > > Heiko has merged now 3 PHY related patches to grf.yaml first. > > > > [PATCH v6 02/17] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,lvds.yaml > > > > See current > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/log/?h=for-next&qt=grep&q=jonker > > > > Not sure what Heiko's plans are. > > Patch 2 replaces only a description text and some accolades removal, so not "too" important. > > > > I urgent then you could merge without conflict: > > 1, 3-8 > > So I've applied patches 1-7 to the drm-tree now. That would have been good a month ago. Now these won't land til 6.4. :( For that reason, if it is after the drm-misc cutoff, I prefer to take DT bindings via my tree. > For the GRF-patch, I've dropped the quotes changes, as they are somewhat > unrelated to the lvds inclusion and so prevented any conflicts when applying > the rest to the DRM tree. Only 1 hunk needed to be dropped to avoid the conflict (which also dropped quotes). If all the quote changes were dropped, please send another patch for that. > @Rob, if you could pick the fusb302 patch (number8), that would be great Will do. Rob
