On 06/02/2023 10:12, Kathiravan T wrote: > > On 2/2/2023 9:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 02/02/2023 15:52, Kathiravan T wrote: >>> Add the mailbox compatible for the IPQ5332 SoC. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml >>> index 943f9472ae10..8d8cd1bbe67e 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml >>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: >>> oneOf: >> - items: >> - enum: >> - qcom,ipq5332-apcs-apps-global >> - const: qcom,ipq6018-apcs-apps-global >> >> and drop the next patch > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > I'm planning to post the V2 of this series. How do you want me to > proceed? I see you posted separate series[1]. May be I can follow the > suggestion which you shared above, starting with IPQ? My series need rebasing on top of Dmitry's fixes, so I propose you just send patch working only for ipq6018, like I wrote above. Best regards, Krzysztof
