On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rob, seeing as we disagree on patch #5, do you have time to discuss this > evening, or tomorrow? Yes, either is fine. Rob > > g. > > On 12 Nov 2014 14:56, "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> [Replying on-list and with original ccs] >> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 11/11/2014 10:42 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> - clocks : List of clocks used by the framebuffer. Clocks listed here >> >> are expected to already be configured correctly. The OS must >> >> ensure these clocks are not modified or disabled while the >> >> simple framebuffer remains active. >> > >> > Updated in my local tree, where I've also added proper commit messages >> > to the 2 patches missing them. Shall I send a v5 of the set, and may I >> > add your Acked-by to this patch when sending v5? >> >> For this whole series, please add my Acked-by. >> >> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I'm okay with the bindings, and I'm okay with adding the clock >> dependency to a simplefb node. I'm happy with the conversation we had >> today on IRC, and I'm expecting to see a binding that covers expected >> firmware/OS behaviour and association with the real hardware posted to >> the list shortly. >> >> g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
