Hi Joe, 2014-11-11 8:58 GMT+01:00 Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi, Matthias, Arnd, > > After previous discussion[1], I'm not sure which one do you preferred > for mt8127/mt8135, so I send 64bits address version again. Trying to not > SPAM too much, I only send the difference(first 4 patches) this time. > > We do have SoC that need >4GB address, so at least those will need to > use 64bits address. If we want to have a consistent look, 64bits is the > way to go. Also we already have some patches under review now using > 64bits address. So I preferred this one, but both versions are OK to me. Regarding Arnd's last email, the 64 bit is the right way. Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> > > Please help to review this and let me know anything you want me to > change. Thanks. > > Joe.C > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/299598.html > > > -- motzblog.wordpress.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
