On 03/02/2023 04:14, yanhong wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/1/18 23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/01/2023 07:17, Yanhong Wang wrote:
>>> Add JH7110 ethernet device node to support gmac driver for the JH7110
>>> RISC-V SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>>> index c22e8f1d2640..c6de6e3b1a25 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>>> @@ -433,5 +433,98 @@
>>> reg-shift = <2>;
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + stmmac_axi_setup: stmmac-axi-config {
>>
>> Why your bindings example is different?
>>
>
> There are two gmacs on the StarFive VF2 board, and the two
> gmacs use the same configuration on axi, so the
> stmmac_axi_setup is independent, which is different
> from the bindings example.
>
>
>> Were the bindings tested? Ahh, no they were not... Can you send only
>> tested patches?
>>
>> Was this tested?
>>
> Yes, the bindings have been tested on the StarFive VF2 board and work normally.
Then please tell me how did you test the bindings on the board? How is
it even possible and how the board is related to bindings? As you could
easily see from Rob's reply they fail, so I have doubts that they were
tested. If you still claim they were - please paste the output from
testing command.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
