On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2014-11-11 16:01 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> So, to be a little pendantic, the 'ti,' prefix is basically just for >> backwards compatibility with the old binding, and that old binding is >> only used on palmas.c, tps65*.c and twl4030-power.c, correct? > > No, the backward compatibility here is only useful for drivers which > used "ti,system-power-controller" in the past and recently switched to > the new property through the standard helper function. As most of the > dts were not updated to use the new property, previous patches broke > compatibility with "ti,system-power-controller" (this compat would be > reverted with this serie). Only one driver has this problem, it is > tps65910. > > So, What you propose is that I should handle the old property directly > from tps65910, and keep the standard helper generic right ? yes as it is a quirk for only that driver. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
