Hi Saravana & Miquel.
Sorry for the long response. I finally got access to my test device
and tried this patch series.
And unfortunately it didn't solve my issue. I'm still getting a
hanging f1070000.ethernet dependency
from the nvmem-cell mac@6 subnode.
Here are related parts of my kernel log and device tree:
[ 2.713302] device: 'mtd-0': device_add
[ 2.719528] device: 'spi0': device_add
[ 2.724180] device: 'spi0.0': device_add
[ 2.728957] spi-nor spi0.0: mx66l51235f (65536 Kbytes)
[ 2.735338] 7 fixed-partitions partitions found on MTD device spi0.0
[ 2.741978] device:
'f1010600.spi:m25p80@0:partitions:partition@1': device_add
[ 2.749636] Creating 7 MTD partitions on "spi0.0":
[ 2.754564] 0x000000000000-0x000000080000 : "SPI.U_BOOT"
[ 2.759981] device: 'mtd0': device_add
[ 2.764323] device: 'mtd0': device_add
[ 2.768280] device: 'mtd0ro': device_add
[ 2.772624] 0x0000000a0000-0x0000000c0000 : "SPI.INV_INFO"
[ 2.778218] device: 'mtd1': device_add
[ 2.782549] device: 'mtd1': device_add
[ 2.786582] device: 'mtd1ro': device_add
...
[ 5.426625] mvneta_bm f10c0000.bm: Buffer Manager for network
controller enabled
[ 5.492867] platform f1070000.ethernet: error -EPROBE_DEFER:
wait for supplier mac@6
[ 5.528636] device: 'Fixed MDIO bus.0': device_add
[ 5.533726] device: 'fixed-0': device_add
[ 5.547564] device: 'f1072004.mdio-eth-mii': device_add
[ 5.616368] device: 'f1072004.mdio-eth-mii:00': device_add
[ 5.645127] device: 'f1072004.mdio-eth-mii:1e': device_add
[ 5.651530] devices_kset: Moving f1070000.ethernet to end of list
[ 5.657948] platform f1070000.ethernet: error -EPROBE_DEFER:
wait for supplier mac@6
spi@10600 {
m25p80@0 {
compatible = "mx66l51235l";
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
partition@0 {
label = "SPI.U_BOOT";
};
partition@1 {
compatible = "nvmem-cells";
label = "SPI.INV_INFO";
macaddr: mac@6 {
reg = <0x6 0x6>;
};
};
...
};
};
};
enet1: ethernet@70000 {
nvmem-cells = <&macaddr>;
nvmem-cell-names = "mac-address";
phy-mode = "rgmii";
phy = <&phy0>;
};
Maybe I should provide some additional debug info?
пн, 30 янв. 2023 г. в 13:48, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi Maxim & Maxim,
>
> saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:11:27 -0800:
>
> > This patch series improves fw_devlink in the following ways:
> >
> > 1. It no longer cares about a fwnode having a "compatible" property. It
> > figures this our more dynamically. The only expectation is that
> > fwnode that are converted to devices actually get probed by a driver
> > for the dependencies to be enforced correctly.
> >
> > 2. Finer grained dependency tracking. fw_devlink will now create device
> > links from the consumer to the actual resource's device (if it has one,
> > Eg: gpio_device) instead of the parent supplier device. This improves
> > things like async suspend/resume ordering, potentially remove the need
> > for frameworks to create device links, more parallelized async probing,
> > and better sync_state() tracking.
> >
> > 3. Handle hardware/software quirks where a child firmware node gets
> > populated as a device before its parent firmware node AND actually
> > supplies a non-optional resource to the parent firmware node's
> > device.
> >
> > 4. Way more robust at cycle handling (see patch for the insane cases).
> >
> > 5. Stops depending on OF_POPULATED to figure out some corner cases.
> >
> > 6. Simplifies the work that needs to be done by the firmware specific
> > code.
> >
> > Sorry it took a while to roll in the fixes I gave in the v1 series
> > thread[1] into a v2 series.
> >
> > Since I didn't make any additional changes on top of what I already gave
> > in the v1 thread and Dmitry is very eager to get this series going, I'm
> > sending it out without testing locally. I already tested these patches a
> > few months ago as part of the v1 series. So I don't expect any major
> > issues. I'll test them again on my end in the next few days and will
> > report here if I actually find anything wrong.
> >
> > Tony, Naresh, Abel, Sudeep, Geert,
> >
> > I got the following reviewed by's and tested by's a few months back, but
> > it's been 5 months since I sent out v1. So I wasn't sure if it was okay
> > to include them in the v2 commits. Let me know if you are okay with this
> > being included in the commits and/or if you want to test this series
> > again.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Dmitry, Maxim(s), Miquel, Luca, Doug, Colin, Martin, Jean-Philippe,
> >
> > I've Cc-ed you because I had pointed you to v1 of this series + the
> > patches in that thread at one point or another as a fix to some issue
> > you were facing. It'd appreciate it if you can test this series and
> > report any issues, or things it fixed and give Tested-bys.
>
> Maxim & Maxim I would really appreciate if you could validate that the
> original issue you had is solved with this version? I don't have any
> hardware suffering from this issue.
>
> > In addition, if you can also apply a revert of this series[2] and delete
> > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() from your tree and see if you hit
> > any issues and report them, that'd be great too! I'm pretty sure some of
> > you will hit issues with that. I want to fix those next and then
> > revert[2].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Saravana
> >
> > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220810060040.321697-1-saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220819221616.2107893-1-saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > [3] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGETcx-JUV1nj8wBJrTPfyvM7=Mre5j_vkVmZojeiumUGG6QZQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Fixed Patch 1 to handle a corner case discussed in [3].
> > - New patch 10 to handle "fsl,imx8mq-gpc" being initialized by 2 drivers.
> > - New patch 11 to add fw_devlink support for SCMI devices.
> >
> > Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Saravana Kannan (11):
> > driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's consumer links
> > driver core: fw_devlink: Improve check for fwnode with no
> > device/driver
> > soc: renesas: Move away from using OF_POPULATED for fw_devlink
> > gpiolib: Clear the gpio_device's fwnode initialized flag before adding
> > driver core: fw_devlink: Add DL_FLAG_CYCLE support to device links
> > driver core: fw_devlink: Allow marking a fwnode link as being part of
> > a cycle
> > driver core: fw_devlink: Consolidate device link flag computation
> > driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle detection more robust
> > of: property: Simplify of_link_to_phandle()
> > irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2: Mark fwnode device as not initialized
> > firmware: arm_scmi: Set fwnode for the scmi_device
> >
> > drivers/base/core.c | 443 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 2 +
> > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 6 +
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c | 1 +
> > drivers/of/property.c | 84 +-----
> > drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c | 1 +
> > drivers/soc/renesas/rcar-sysc.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> > include/linux/fwnode.h | 12 +-
> > 9 files changed, 332 insertions(+), 220 deletions(-)
> >
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
