On 1/18/2023 12:08 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 08:33:08PM +0530, devi priya wrote:
Add mp5496 PMIC compatible string for IPQ9574 SoC
Co-developed-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml
index 8c45f53212b1..7907d9385583 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ description:
Each sub-node is identified using the node's name, with valid values listed
for each of the pmics below.
- For mp5496, s2
+ For mp5496, s1, s2
For pm2250, s1, s2, s3, s4, l1, l2, l3, l4, l5, l6, l7, l8, l9, l10, l11,
l12, l13, l14, l15, l16, l17, l18, l19, l20, l21, l22
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ properties:
compatible:
enum:
- qcom,rpm-mp5496-regulators
+ - qcom,rpm-ipq9574-mp5496-regulators
Is this a different part than just mp5496? Or used in a different,
incompatible way?
IPQ6018 and IPQ9574 platforms use the same PMIC MP5496 but they have a
different power layout.So, we plan to update the compatible:
qcom,rpm-mp5496-regulators to
qcom,rpm-ipq6018-mp5496-regulators(target-specific) in the next patchset
as the regulators serve different purposes
- qcom,rpm-pm2250-regulators
- qcom,rpm-pm6125-regulators
- qcom,rpm-pm660-regulators
--
2.17.1
Best Regards,
Devi Priya
