Hi On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:11 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Dario Binacchi (2023-01-01 09:57:29) > > The idea for this series was born back from Dublin (ELCE 2022) after > > having attended the talk entitled "Updating and Modernizing Clock > > Drivers" held by Chen-Yu Tsai and the availability of a board with > > imx8mn SOC. > > Interesting. I didn't see any mention of putting clks into DT in that > presentation. > > > > > This series aims to setup all imx8mn's clocks from the device tree and > > remove the legacy setup code with hardwired parameters. > > Please, no! We don't want one node per clk style of bindings. I think the idea behind is: - create a way from silicon vendor to export their clock mapping with automatic exportation - reduce the copy and paste code across the drivers - avoid code duplication Is the binding a way to solve this problem? If you don't want one node per clk style bindings, did you still think that the way to go is totally wrong? Michael
