On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 21:22, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +Sudeep > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:56:41AM +0100, Etienne Carriere wrote: > > Adds an optional interrupt controller property to optee firmware node > > in the DT bindings. Optee driver may embeds an irqchip exposing > > interrupts notified by the TEE world. Optee registers up to 1 interrupt > > controller and identifies each line with a line number from 0 to > > UINT16_MAX. > > > > In the example, the platform SCMI device uses optee interrupt irq 5 > > as async signal to trigger processing of an async incoming SCMI message, > > in the scope of a CPU DVFS control. A platform can have several SCMI > > channels driven this way. Optee irqs also permits small embedded devices > > to share e.g. a gpio expander, a group of wakeup sources, etc... between > > OP-TEE world (for sensitive services) and Linux world (for non-sensitive > > services). The physical controller is driven from the TEE which exposes > > some controls to Linux kernel. > > > > Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Co-developed-by: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes since v1: > > - Added a description to #interrupt-cells property. > > - Changed of example. Linux wakeup event was subject to discussion and > > i don't know much about input events in Linux. So move to SCMI. > > In the example, an SCMI server in OP-TEE world raises optee irq 5 > > so that Linux scmi optee channel &scmi_cpu_dvfs pushed in the incoming > > SCMI message in the scmi device for liekly later processing in threaded > > context. The example includes all parties: optee, scmi, sram, gic. > > - Obviously rephrased the commit message. > > - Added Cc: tags > > --- > > .../arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml | 67 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml > > index d4dc0749f9fd..9c00c27f8b2c 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml > > @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ properties: > > HVC #0, register assignments > > register assignments are specified in drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h > > > > + interrupt-controller: true > > + > > + "#interrupt-cells": > > + const: 1 > > + description: | > > + OP-TEE exposes irq for irp chip controllers from OP-TEE world. Each > > + irq is assigned a single line number identifier used as first argument. > > + > > required: > > - compatible > > - method > > @@ -64,3 +72,62 @@ examples: > > method = "hvc"; > > }; > > }; > > + > > + - | > > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > > + firmware { > > + optee: optee { > > + compatible = "linaro,optee-tz"; > > + method = "smc"; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 187 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <1>; > > + }; > > + > > + scmi { > > + compatible = "linaro,scmi-optee"; > > + linaro,optee-channel-id = <0>; > > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + scmi_cpu_dvfs: protocol@13 { > > + reg = <0x13>; > > + linaro,optee-channel-id = <1>; > > + shmem = <&scmi_shm_tx>, <&scmi_shm_rx>; > > + interrupts-extended = <&optee 5>; > > + interrupt-names = "a2p"; > > These properties aren't documented. Soon there will be a warning[1]. They are. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm%2Cscmi.yaml#L45-L53 In arm,scmi.yaml, interrupts optional property stands for interrupts and interrupts-extended, no? > > > + #clock-cells = <1>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + gic: interrupt-controller@a0021000 { > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic"; > > + reg = <0xa0021000 0x1000>, <0xa0022000 0x2000>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > > + }; > > + > > + soc { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + > > + sram@2ffff000 { > > + compatible = "mmio-sram"; > > + reg = <0x2ffff000 0x1000>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges = <0 0x2ffff000 0x1000>; > > + > > + scmi_shm_tx: scmi-sram@0 { > > + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem"; > > + reg = <0 0x80>; > > + }; > > + > > + scmi_shm_rx: scmi-sram@100 { > > + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem"; > > + reg = <0x100 0x80>; > > + }; > > There's no need to show providers in examples (unless the example is for > the provider). Ok, i'll simplify the example Thanks, Etienne > > Rob