Am 20. Januar 2023 21:53:14 MEZ schrieb "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>: >index 25d31e40a553..5eb698a90d34 100644 >--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi >+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi >@@ -981,6 +981,20 @@ eth: ethernet@1b100000 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > status = "disabled"; >+ >+ gmac0: mac@0 { >+ compatible = "mediatek,eth-mac"; >+ reg = <0>; >+ phy-mode = "trgmii"; >+ status = "disabled"; >+ }; >+ >+ gmac1: mac@1 { >+ compatible = "mediatek,eth-mac"; >+ reg = <1>; >+ phy-mode = "rgmii"; >+ status = "disabled"; >+ }; > }; > >diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts >index 5008115d2494..a5800a524302 100644 >--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts >+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts >@@ -175,9 +175,7 @@ ð { > status = "okay"; > > gmac0: mac@0 { Should node not be accessed with label (&gmac0) instead of defining it again and shadow the one from dtsi? >- compatible = "mediatek,eth-mac"; >- reg = <0>; >- phy-mode = "trgmii"; >+ status = "okay"; > > fixed-link { > speed = <1000>; Same for other boards. regards Frank