On 23-01-23 11:19:38, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:46:54PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:01:51PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > Add the SM8550 compatible to the list. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml > > > index 0c6b3ba7346b..cba2a252baf8 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml > > > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties: > > > - qcom,sm8350-qmp-usb3-phy > > > - qcom,sm8350-qmp-usb3-uni-phy > > > - qcom,sm8450-qmp-usb3-phy > > > + - qcom,sm8550-qmp-usb3-phy > > > > This one too should be based on sc8280xp rather than the legacy binding > > scheme. > > I can't seem to find a v2 of this one adding a new-style binding for > sm8550. > > Note that the corresponding dts changes have already been merged: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230119004533.1869870-2-abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx/ As we discussed on Friday, I intend to apply the same strategy as for pcie. I haven't managed to send the v2 for this one yet. The order is, UFS, PCIe and then USB. Since the patchsets are based on each other, I'm trying to make sure PCIe is in the proper shape before moving on to USB. > > Johan
