On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:14 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible. > Replace all the compatibles in gpio nodes to be able to > give them a consistent ID independent from probe order or alias. > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > For now only add new compatibles. > No changes to rockchip_gpio_probe() function yet. > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > index e5de15a2a..493207de1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > @@ -790,7 +790,22 @@ static int rockchip_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > static const struct of_device_id rockchip_gpio_match[] = { > { .compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,px30-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066a-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3128-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank", }, > { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank0" }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3308-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3368-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-gpio-bank", }, > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rv1126-gpio-bank", }, > { }, > }; > > -- > 2.20.1 > If they don't have any additional data associated with each compatible - why not just use "rockchip,gpio-bank" as the fallback in DT? Bart