On 1/18/23 13:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 18/01/2023 13:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 1/18/23 12:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 17/01/2023 23:38, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add maintainers entry for DH electronics DHCOM i.MX8M Plus
based SoMs and boards.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
---
Cc: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index d0a36e45aa4be..e9be585d507e9 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -5968,6 +5968,12 @@ S: Maintained
F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6*-dhcom-*
F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6*-dhcor-*
+DH ELECTRONICS IMX8M PLUS DHCOM BOARD SUPPORT
+M: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
+L: kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+S: Maintained
+F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp*-dhcom-*
We do not keep maintainer per board. The idea was to use in-board
emails, but the patch doing that was not accepted. But regardless -
entries per board in maintainers is crazy amount of new entries. Way too
many.
What would you propose I should do here to get a valid entry for this
machine ?
There can be no entry for the machine because we do not keep entries for
machines. Just look at MAINTAINERS file.
If anyone thinks per-board maintainership is useful, should revive patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210809080204.8381-1-shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx/
This wouldn't add the L: list entries to CC, would it ?
