Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On pią, 2014-11-07 at 20:50 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On 11/07/2014 08:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > The bootloader on market Rinato (Gear 2) device checks for revision in > > > compatible field of DTB. If it is not present or lower than required > > > then booting fails with: "Could not do normal boot. (no DTB found)". > > > > > > Log of bootloader in case of failure: > > > h/w: revision = 0x06 > > > h/w: schematic = SM-R380_Rev0.5_Final_0205 > > > date = 2000/01/01 12:00:21 (UTC) > > > cmu_div:4, div:5, src_clk:800000000, pixel_clk:31860720 > > > load_kernel: loading boot image from 57344.. (BOOT) > > > load_kernel: found zImage, size: 0x3267e8 > > > 0xbc Error! > > > Verify_Binary_Signature: failed. > > > pit_check_signature (BOOT) invalid. > > > load_kernel: found custom kernel (ret:-2147483647) > > > No need to update kernel type. > > > Detected board: samsung,rinato-rev06 > > > Could not do normal boot. (no DTB found) > > > : Entering usb mode for SM-R380_EUR_XX (65535).. > > > > > > Add a "rev06" suffix to compatible to satisfy the bootloader. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 3 ++- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts > > > index 84380fa13e37..f72ba0a1d915 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts > > > @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ > > > > > > / { > > > model = "Samsung Rinato board"; > > > - compatible = "samsung,rinato", "samsung,exynos3250", "samsung,exynos3"; > > > + compatible = "samsung,rinato", "samsung,rinato-rev06", > > > + "samsung,exynos3250", "samsung,exynos3"; > > > > I think it is wrong. The released bootloader from Samsung is not u-boot. > > Instead, you have to update u-boot to support Exynos3250-basd Rinato board. > > The bootloader on device also was not a u-boot. So the fix is for native > bootloader delivered on device. > > I do not insist that this is proper fix. It was just needed to boot the > device with custom kernel. > > Anyway, thanks for comments! > Hi Krzysztof and Chanwoo, So, we don’t need this to fix the problem Krzysztof said? OK. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html