On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:38:03AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > + int val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]; > + > + if (!!(twl4030_read(codec, TWL4030_REG_CODEC_MODE) > + & TWL4030_OPTION_1) == !!val) > + /* No change */ > + return 0; We shouldn't be accepting attempts to set out of range values so there should be no need for the !! on val (which confused me when I was reading this).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature