On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 09:00 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/01/2023 03:42, Moudy Ho (何宗原) wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 12:58 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 13/01/2023 06:42, Moudy Ho wrote: > > > > MT8195 vppsys0/1 should be probed from mtk-mmsys driver to > > > > populate device by platform_device_register_data then start > > > > its own clock driver. > > > > > > Unfortunately I don't understand why this justifies removal of > > > compatibles. > > > > > > How do you propagate or instantiate devices is not really > > > connected > > > with > > > the hardware description. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > Refer to the comments of 0/8 and 1/8 in the following series: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=702518__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!iR9oqyYsBrujnl_v5DEuDZrTGp75iBKkLK99KWQV391krqpZ_lK3d2Yr9MKxgROBuVgq2fnV9cFs7jzGwRjYX5_zjL0o$ ; > > > > > > This patch is used in conjunction with another one(Message ID = > > 20230113054304.21841-7-moudy.ho@xxxxxxxxxxxx/) to fix the binding > > warnings caused by newly added in MMSYS. > > The patch should stand on its own. IOW, it should explain everything > needed and it should justify its existence. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for the suggestion, I will split all related patches into another series. Sincerely, Moudy
