Quoting Oleksij Rempel (2023-01-13 06:27:02) > It is not clear from the code what clock should be taken. So, make sure it > is readable and no other clock will be taken by accident. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c > index 7f6200925752..4885d3dfcf7f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static void __init imx6q_1588_init(void) > if (!IS_ERR(fec_enet_ref)) > goto put_node; > > - ptp_clk = of_clk_get(np, 2); > + ptp_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "ptp"); The 'clocks' property in DTS should not be reordered. Order matters in the binding. This patch makes the code do a string comparison (or a few?) in the name of readability. Perhaps make a #define for '2' like CLOCKS_PTP_INDEX, or just don't change it because it ain't broke.
