Siddharth, On 11/01/2023 13:44, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote: > The CPTS hardware doesn't support PPS signal generation. Using the GenFx > (periodic signal generator) function, it is possible to model a PPS signal > followed by routing it via the time sync router to the CPTS_HWy_TS_PUSH > (hardware time stamp) input, in order to generate timestamps at 1 second > intervals. > > This series adds driver support for enabling PPS signal generation. > Additionally, the documentation for the am65-cpts driver is updated with > the bindings for the "ti,pps" property, which is used to inform the > pair [CPTS_HWy_TS_PUSH, GenFx] to the cpts driver. The PPS example is > enabled for AM625-SK board by default, by adding the timesync_router node > to the AM62x SoC, and configuring it for PPS in the AM625-SK board dts. > > Grygorii Strashko (3): > dt-binding: net: ti: am65x-cpts: add 'ti,pps' property > net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: add pps support > net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: adjust pps following ptp changes > > Siddharth Vadapalli (2): > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Add timesync router node > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add cpsw3g cpts PPS support Device tree patches need to be sent separately. You don't need to involve net maintainers for that. If you introduce a new binding then that needs to be in maintainer's tree before you can send a related device tree patch. > > .../bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpts.yaml | 8 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi | 9 ++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts | 20 +++ > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > cheers, -roger
