Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] serial: mxs-auart: use mctrl_gpio helpers for handling modem signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Friday, November 07, 2014 at 02:34:31 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
> why change them to gpio?  If we change them to gpio.  Could the DMA still
> works fine?
> did you test the DMA with this patch?
> 
> Add Marek for this patch too.

I didn't look too deep into the patch, so here's just my experience:

1) The AUART block signals and GPIO block signals are not sychronised using the 
   same clock. Therefore, the latency between toggling of the AUART lines and
   the GPIO-driven pins will not be deterministic and will vary. There might be
   a way to approximate that, but that's definitelly not a reliable solution.

   This is very bad for example if you drive RS485 DIR line with the RTS pin as
   a GPIO ; the RTS pin will toggle at non-deterministic time compared to the
   end of UART transmission. This will trigger bit-loss on the RS485 line and
   you just don't want that.

2) Speaking of RS485, there's [1] and [2]. which I believe apply to any combo
   of UART+GPIO toggling.

So I hate to bring the bad news , but UART+GPIO combo toggling is really a bad
bad idea.

HTH

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.serial/6770
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.serial/3619/

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux