Hi Adrian, Thanks for the review comments. On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:08:26AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 19/12/22 16:24, Piyush Malgujar wrote: > > From: Jayanthi Annadurai <jannadurai@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add config option to choose the sdhci timeout in seconds. > > This approach is not ok, but why is the change wanted? > This option was just to give flexibility to opt for a different timeout value based on requirement, for instance, to decrease the time of tuning process. Although it is not a mandatory change, we can remove this option and go with the default one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jayanthi Annadurai <jannadurai@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 3 ++- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > > index b5b2ae0bb4625bdb9d17acdbb1887c9caa3a1f32..ab48f2bc4cff73d1aad8d7da542d761cf0346d9f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > > @@ -1132,3 +1132,11 @@ config MMC_LITEX > > module will be called litex_mmc. > > > > If unsure, say N. > > + > > +config MMC_SDHCI_TIMEOUT > > + int > > + default 1 if MMC_SDHCI_CADENCE > > + default 10 > > + depends on MMC_SDHCI > > + help > > + Default timeout value for command and data. > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > index f3af1bd0f7b955272fbd8b034ecb591860b89aed..e9bc24258746834ec9c8f13fe24456587a2b758d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > @@ -1707,7 +1707,8 @@ static bool sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd) > > else if (!cmd->data && cmd->busy_timeout > 9000) > > timeout += DIV_ROUND_UP(cmd->busy_timeout, 1000) * HZ + HZ; > > else > > - timeout += 10 * HZ; > > + timeout += CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_TIMEOUT * HZ; > > + > > sdhci_mod_timer(host, cmd->mrq, timeout); > > > > if (host->use_external_dma) > Thanks, Piyush