Thomas, Any comments on the patch below? Let me know if you want to keep the devm stuff out of kernel/irq/manage.c. * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [141001 20:45]: > Hi Thomas, > > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [140919 12:47]: > > > > The wakeup handler is supposed to bring the thing out of deep sleep > > and nothing else. All you want it to do is to mask itself and save the > > information that the real device irq is pending. > > > > A stub handler for the wakeup irq is enough. We can have that in the > > irq/pm core and all it would do is simply: > > Here's a patch along the lines of what you described, hopefully that's > fairly close to what you had in mind. > > I also did play with the replaying of the interrupts but I don't think > that's needed. Well at least not for the omap case. I added some > comments about that to the code. > > So far I've tested with the omap-serial and omap_hsmmc drivers. The > serial driver does not have any status as the device is powered off. > So replaying of the interrupt does not help there, we need to wait for > the next event anyways. > > Then with omap_hsmmc the SDIO interrupt on dat1 line is level > sensitive and is noticed after the MMC controller is powered on > again. So no replaying of the device interrupt needed here either. > > I still have not tested the MMC remux lines to GPIO for wake-up > events that's also needed for some omaps. > > Regards, > > Tony > > 8<----------- > From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:56:35 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add support for wake-up interrupts to fix irq reentry issues in drivers > > As pointed out by Thomas Gleixner, at least omap wake-up interrupts > have an issue with re-entrant interrupts because the wake-up interrupts > are now handled as a secondary interrupt controller. Further, the > wake-up interrupt just needs wake the system at least for omaps. So we > should just make the wake-up interrupt handling generic. > > Note that at least initially we are keeping things simple by assuming the > wake-up interrupt is level sensitive, and the device pm_runtime_resume() > can deal with the situation, and no replaying of the lost device interrupts > is needed. > > After tinkering with replaying of the lost device interrupts, my opinion is > that it should be avoided because of the issues listed in the comments of > this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h > +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h > @@ -139,11 +139,15 @@ extern int __must_check > request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, > const char *devname, void __percpu *percpu_dev_id); > > +struct device; > + > +extern int __must_check > +request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq, > + unsigned long irqflags); > + > extern void free_irq(unsigned int, void *); > extern void free_percpu_irq(unsigned int, void __percpu *); > > -struct device; > - > extern int __must_check > devm_request_threaded_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, > irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn, > @@ -163,6 +167,10 @@ devm_request_any_context_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, > irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long irqflags, > const char *devname, void *dev_id); > > +extern int __must_check > +devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq, > + unsigned long irqflags); > + > extern void devm_free_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, void *dev_id); > > /* > --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/random.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <linux/sched/rt.h> > @@ -1578,6 +1579,111 @@ int request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_any_context_irq); > > +/** > + * handle_wakeirq_thread - call device runtime pm calls on wake-up interrupt > + * @wakeirq: device specific wake-up interrupt > + * @dev_id: struct device entry > + */ > +static irqreturn_t handle_wakeirq_thread(int wakeirq, void *dev_id) > +{ > + struct device *dev = dev_id; > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; > + > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) { > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev); > + pm_request_resume(dev); > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +/** > + * setup_wakeirq - allocate a wake-up interrupt for a device > + * @dev: device to wake up > + * @wakeirq: interrupt that wakes up the device > + * @wakeflags: flags to pass to the interrupt handler > + * @devm: use devm > + * > + * Note that the wake-up interrupt starts disabled. The wake-up interrupt > + * is typically enabled from the device pm_runtime_suspend() and disabled > + * again in the device pm_runtime_resume(). For runtime PM, the wake-up > + * interrupt should be always enabled, and for device suspend and resume, > + * the wake-up interrupt should be enabled depending on the device specific > + * configuration for device_can_wakeup(). > + * > + * Note also that we are not resending the lost device interrupts. > + * We assume that the wake-up interrupt just needs to wake-up the device, > + * and then device pm_runtime_resume() can deal with the situation. > + * > + * There are at least the following reasons to not resend the lost device > + * interrupts automatically based on the wake-up interrupt: > + * > + * 1. There can be interrupt reentry issues calling the device interrupt > + * based on the wake-up interrupt if done in the device driver. It > + * could be done with check_irq_resend() after checking the device > + * interrupt mask if we really wanted to though. > + * > + * 2. The device interrupt handler would need to be set up properly with > + * pm_runtime_irq_safe(). Ideally you don't want to call pm_runtime > + * calls from the device interrupt handler at all. > + * > + * 3. The IRQ subsystem may not know if it's safe to call the device > + * interrupt unless the driver updates the interrupt status with > + * disable_irq() and enable_irq() in addition to just disabling the > + * interrupt at the hardware level in the device registers. > + * > + * So if replaying the lost device interrupts is absolutely needed from the > + * hardware point of view, it's probably best to set up a completely > + * separate wake-up interrupt handler for the wake-up interrupt in the > + * device driver because of the reasons above. > + */ > +static int setup_wakeirq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq, > + unsigned long wakeflags, bool devm) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (!(dev && wakeirq)) { > + pr_err("Missing device or wakeirq for %s irq %d\n", > + dev_name(dev), wakeirq); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (!(wakeflags & > + (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT))) { > + pr_err("Invalid wakeirq for %s irq %d, must be level oneshot\n", > + dev_name(dev), wakeirq); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + irq_set_status_flags(wakeirq, _IRQ_NOAUTOEN); > + > + if (devm) > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, wakeirq, NULL, > + handle_wakeirq_thread, > + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev); > + else > + ret = request_threaded_irq(wakeirq, NULL, > + handle_wakeirq_thread, > + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +int request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq, > + unsigned long wakeflags) > +{ > + return setup_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags, false); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_wake_irq); > + > +int devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq, > + unsigned long wakeflags) > +{ > + return setup_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags, false); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_request_wake_irq); > + > void enable_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type) > { > unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html