On 09/01/2023 19:45, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> Add power domain description for sa8775p and a new compatible to match it. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
[skipped]
+/* SA8775P RPMH power domains */ +static struct rpmhpd *sa8775p_rpmhpds[] = { + [SA8775P_CX] = &cx, + [SA8775P_CX_AO] = &cx_ao, + [SA8775P_EBI] = &ebi, + [SA8775P_GFX] = &gfx, + [SA8775P_LCX] = &lcx, + [SA8775P_LMX] = &lmx, + [SA8775P_MMCX] = &mmcx, + [SA8775P_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao, + [SA8775P_MXC] = &mxc, + [SA8775P_MXC_AO] = &mxc_ao,
Is there any parent/child relationship between mmcx/mxc and other domains?
+ [SA8775P_MX] = &mx, + [SA8775P_MX_AO] = &mx_ao, + [SA8775P_NSP0] = &nsp0, + [SA8775P_NSP1] = &nsp1, +}; + +static const struct rpmhpd_desc sa8775p_desc = { + .rpmhpds = sa8775p_rpmhpds, + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sa8775p_rpmhpds), +}; + /* SDM670 RPMH powerdomains */ static struct rpmhpd *sdm670_rpmhpds[] = { [SDM670_CX] = &cx_w_mx_parent, @@ -487,6 +520,7 @@ static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8280xp_desc = { static const struct of_device_id rpmhpd_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-rpmhpd", .data = &qdu1000_desc }, { .compatible = "qcom,sa8540p-rpmhpd", .data = &sa8540p_desc }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-rpmhpd", .data = &sa8775p_desc }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7180_desc }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7280_desc }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8180x_desc },
-- With best wishes Dmitry