Re: [PATCH] PCI: add missing DT binding for linux,pci-domain property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thursday 06 November 2014 12:36:42 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > ACPI is easy here, because it already requires the domain to be
> > explicit.
> 
> I was thinking more along the line of code sharing.
> 

I don't think it's worth it here. In general, it's a good idea,
but the way that ACPI represents PCI is very different. In particular,
it doesn't support multiple kinds of host controllers, only ECAM
config space registers with no special setup code for other hardware
registers. The domain is part of the addressing mechanism for finding
the right ECAM register.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux