On 07/01/2023 15:07, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:00:56 +0100 > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] >>>> I asked to remove half-compatible. Not to enforce. >>>> > so you are saying that allowing > compatible = "A", "B" > is not ok, if B is not fully compatible. I agree with that > one. I did not say that. It's not related to this problem. Again - you cannot have device which is and is not compatible with something else. It's not a Schroedinger's cat to be in two states, unless you explicitly document the cases (there are exception). If this is such exception, it requires it's own documentation. Best regards, Krzysztof