On 07/12/2022 02:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > SM8350 and SM8450 platforms use the same driver and same bindings as the > existing 7nm DSI PHYs. Add corresponding compatibility strings. > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > index c851770bbdf2..bffd161fedfd 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ allOf: > properties: > compatible: > enum: > + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350 > + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450 If this patch was not merged (so far nothing in next), can we make it proper SoC compatible? qcom,sm8450-dsi-phy-5nm The SC7280 already uses such pattern. > - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm > - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150 > - qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm Best regards, Krzysztof
