On 04/01/2023 00:35, Linus Walleij wrote: > It turns out that this IP block exists in at least two > incarnations: FOTG200 and FOTG210. The one in the Gemini > is FOTG200, so add the variants and rectify the binding > for Gemini. > > This affects things such as the placement of certain > registers. > > It remains to be seen how similar this block is to the > third USB block from Faraday, FUSB220. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml > index 84b3b69256b1..12d4fc742f20 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml# > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > -title: Faraday Technology FOTG210 HS OTG USB 2.0 controller > +title: Faraday Technology FOTG200 series HS OTG USB 2.0 controller Bindings That's not correct change, probably due to rebasing. Change the name only, do not add "Bindings". Best regards, Krzysztof
