Only arm,primecell is documented as compatible string for Primecell peripherals. Current code agrees with that. Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst | 2 +- Documentation/translations/zh_CN/devicetree/usage-model.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst index b6a287955ee5..0717426856b2 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst @@ -415,6 +415,6 @@ When using the DT, this creates problems for of_platform_populate() because it must decide whether to register each node as either a platform_device or an amba_device. This unfortunately complicates the device creation model a little bit, but the solution turns out not to -be too invasive. If a node is compatible with "arm,amba-primecell", then +be too invasive. If a node is compatible with "arm,primecell", then of_platform_populate() will register it as an amba_device instead of a platform_device. diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/devicetree/usage-model.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/devicetree/usage-model.rst index c6aee82c7e6e..19ba4ae0cd81 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/devicetree/usage-model.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/devicetree/usage-model.rst @@ -325,6 +325,6 @@ Primecell设备。然而，棘手的一点是，AMBA总线上的所有设备并 当使用DT时，这给of_platform_populate()带来了问题，因为它必须决定是否将 每个节点注册为platform_device或amba_device。不幸的是，这使设备创建模型 -变得有点复杂，但解决方案原来并不是太具有侵略性。如果一个节点与“arm,amba-primecell” +变得有点复杂，但解决方案原来并不是太具有侵略性。如果一个节点与“arm,primecell” 兼容，那么of_platform_populate()将把它注册为amba_device而不是 platform_device。 -- 2.39.0
