On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 18:35 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 26/12/2022 à 15:29, Angel Iglesias a écrit : > > Adds compatibility with the new sensor generation, the BMP580. > > > > The measurement and initialization codepaths are adapted from > > the device datasheet and the repository from manufacturer at > > https://github.com/boschsensortec/BMP5-Sensor-API. > > > > Signed-off-by: Angel Iglesias > > <ang.iglesiasg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > [...] > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280.h b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280.h > > index efc31bc84708..27d2abc17d01 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280.h > > +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280.h > > [...] > > > +#define BMP580_CHIP_ID 0x50 > > #define BMP380_CHIP_ID 0x50 > > Hi, > > this is maybe correct (I've not been able to find the datasheet to check > myself), but it looks odd to have the same ID for 2 different chips. Yes, I also couldn't find a datasheet for the BMP580 or a devkit anywhere. I'm developing this using the BMP581, which seems to be a variant almost identical. Something similar happened with the BMP38x; you could find the BMP384 and the BMP388, but the BMP380 was unavailable everywhere, datasheet included. My guess is this is a similar situation. In any case, the datasheet of the BMP581 is available here: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bmp581-ds004.pdf Regarding the chip id being the same between generations is weird, but at least the datasheet and the sensor I have uses 0x50 as the chip id. After you mentioned this, I checked back on the reference API repository from Bosch and it has both 0x50 and 0x51 as valid IDs: * https://github.com/boschsensortec/BMP5-Sensor-API/blob/master/bmp5_defs.h#L198 * https://github.com/boschsensortec/BMP5-Sensor-API/blob/master/bmp5.c#L1444 Angel > CJ > > > #define BMP180_CHIP_ID 0x55 > > #define BMP280_CHIP_ID 0x58 >
