On 29/12/2022 11:45, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 29.12.2022 11:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/12/2022 11:32, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add the spmi bus as found in the SM8450 SoC
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [Konrad: 0x0 -> 0, move #cells down, make reg-names a vertical list]
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> No changes
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> index 570475040d95..b9b59c5223eb 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> @@ -2715,6 +2715,28 @@ aoss_qmp: power-controller@c300000 {
>>> #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + spmi_bus: spmi@c42d000 {
>>
>> Hmm looks different than reg.
>>
>>> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>>> + reg = <0 0x0c400000 0 0x00003000>,
>>> + <0 0x0c500000 0 0x00400000>,
>>> + <0 0x0c440000 0 0x00080000>,
>>> + <0 0x0c4c0000 0 0x00010000>,
>>> + <0 0x0c42d000 0 0x00010000>;
>> x
> Hm, my guess would be that Vinod chose to put the "cnfg" reg
> instead of "core" in the unit address, as 8450 has 2 SPMI bus
> hosts and they both share the core reg, so it would have been
> impossible to have two spmi@core nodes..
Eh? SM8450 has 2 SPMI hosts both using 0x0c400000? How does that work?
Usually address can be mapped only once.
Where is the second SPMI? I cannot find it in linux-next.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
