On 28/12/2022 13:50, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 28/12/2022 13:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it is >>>> optional: >>>> >>>> sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>> Is it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop >>> it on the driver side as per usual? >> >> It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere... >> Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock? > > Yes. In the past few months we have been removing the core_bi_pll_test > from the old clock drivers (and new clock drivers mostly lack them). > Let's remove it from the rest of clock drivers. If you are going to start doing the same work, please at least share it upfront. Best regards, Krzysztof
