On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:16:09AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Nothing will break. But I think Mark prefers the dependency rename, now > > done in 7/8, to be done as part of this patch. > I don't agree. The rename should be taken independantly by Mark. > The regulator driver won't build until they match anyway, so there's > no hard dependency. Unless someone can give me a really good reason > to revert it, I'm applying this driver now. The important thing is that the dependency rename isn't silently thrown into an unrelated patch.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
