On 27/12/2022 12:14, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 24.12.2022 14:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/12/2022 17:20, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23.12.2022 17:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Add SoC-specific compatible to the USB HS PHY to match other devices and
>>>> bindings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi
>>>> index b073e0c63df4..d3c661d7650d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi
>>>> @@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ blsp1_uart3: serial@831000 {
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> usb_hsphy: phy@ff4000 {
>>>> - compatible = "qcom,usb-snps-hs-7nm-phy";
>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sdx65-usb-hs-phy",
>>>> + "qcom,usb-snps-hs-7nm-phy";
>>> Not sure if the newline is necessary, but still:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> It is over 80 - up to 90 - and we still keep 80-limit in coding style.
> Torvalds said 100 is fine a year a go or so.
Yes - when it increases the readability. When it does not, the limit by
coding style is still 80. Otherwise the coding style would be updated,
which did not happen:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220119160642.140e84c6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
