On 23.12.2022 14:08, Marijn Suijten wrote: > On 2022-12-23 13:00:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> >> On 22.12.2022 21:36, Marijn Suijten wrote: >>> While SDHCI 1 appears to work out of the box, we cannot rely on the >>> bootloader-enabled regulators nor expect them to remain enabled (e.g. >>> when finally dropping pd_ignore_unused). >> >> Unrelated, unused-yet-enabled (as far as Linux is concerned, anyway, >> it doesn't know the state of smd rpm regulators unless you add >> regulator-boot-on) regulators get swept by "regulator cleanup". > > That's exactly the point made here: at least this way Linux knows that > these regulators should remain enabled. Even if it doesn't know about > many others and would fall flat on its face regardless when disabling > others as part of regulator cleanup. > > Unless you meant something different? I meant that regulators are not handled by pd_ignore_unused, but rather by a similar mechanism. Konrad > > - Marijn
