On 22/12/2022 13:32, Emekcan Aras wrote: > Adds device tree and correspondent binding for ARM Corstone500 reference > solution. > > Thanks for the comments, and sorry for the late reply. Most of the comments are > addressed except one. > > @Krzysztof Kozlowski: Thanks a lot for the comments. I've tried to fixed all of > them. Just have one question regarding having no dtsi or compatible platform. > Corstone500 is a reference hardware design, however there is no silicon solution > from it yet. And from device tree perspective, both FPGA and FVP (virtual > platform) implementations are identical(same addresses and same nodes, etc.). > So we didn't want to create a seperate dtsi file. What would you recommend here > ? Can you point me to a device tree from a similar platform? Corstone1000 was accepted that way, so it is fine. I am just surprised that if you are going to have silicons with it, there is no common compatible and no shared DTSI. What do you expect from customer? Re-implement and copy most of your DTS? Best regards, Krzysztof
