Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: Document common device controller bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/12/2022 14:01, Gatien CHEVALLIER wrote:
> 

>>
>> Anyway you duplicate work here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/c869d2751125181a55bc8a88c96e3a892b42f37a.1668070216.git.oleksii_moisieiev@xxxxxxxx/
>> and maybe you duplicate comments.
>>
>> I don't think there is point to review things twice, so NAK.
> This is a result of me not knowing how to handle this particular case. 
> It is a patch that I need to have in my patch set in order to pass Rob's 
> bindings check. Otherwise, feature domains bindings defined here will 
> not be known in the STM32 System Bus binding file, where they are used.
> 
> I wanted to illustrate the use of Oleksii's binding with a practical 
> use-case that we want to implement.

Mention patch dependency in the path changelog (---) and that's it. No
tests will be done. You are expected to run tests anyway on your side,
before sending.

> 
> What would be the correct way of managing this dependency?
> -Specify something like "On top of ...." in the cover letter/patch and 
> reference the other thread?
> -Use a "Depends-On" tag on the YAML binding commit?
> -Something else?

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux